菜單

遵循 @ lockdownlive 在twitter上.

scdsc

詳細信息

  • 政府名稱: Eric Van Buren
  • 註冊號碼: 11044-068
  • 年齡:42
  • 服務時間:14 歲月
  • 家鄉:華盛頓D.C.
  • 句子:LIFE
  • 電流充電:Drug Conspiracy
  • 別號:大的Erk, 雀斑, 比亞爾
  • 發布日期:寬大候選人
  • 監獄所屬:Another Chance 4 Legal (AC4L)
  • 影響圈:馬庫斯·馬丁, Another Chance 4 Legal
  • 機構:USP迦南
  • There is no honor in coming to prison. It does NOT make you a man.

法律更新: 刑事判決

law-library-jailhouse-lawyer

傳統, 它不是被告的有罪或無罪,,en,這已經動搖了我們社區的基礎,,en,可能是所有犯罪的歷史上最好的年份之一,,en,你們所有追隨我的人都知道我為什麼相信刑事司法系統是少數群體被剝奪背後的驅動力之一,,en,在家裡的UNIT組成了鄰居,,en,社區的縣,,en,很容易看到,整個國家的人民都會受到法律和政策的影響,,en,如果我們把正確/錯誤的人放在合適的位置來拉弦,那麼我們就不需要大量的陰謀來傷害一群人,,en,只是FEW的歸納影響,,en,是FEW,,en,

但句子, 此規定, that has shaken the very foundation of our communities.

2016 may be one of the best years in ALL the history of criminal SENTENCING.

All of you who follow me know why I believe that the criminal justice system has been ONE OF THE DRIVING FORCES behind the decimation of minority communities. The UNIT in the home makes up the NEIGHBORHOOD, 鄰里社區, the community the COUNTY, 縣STATE, 和國家民族. It is easy to see that an entire NATION of people can be affected by law and policy. If we put the right/wrong people in position to pull the strings then we do not need a MASS conspiracy to harm a faction of people, just the inductive influence of the FEW. 資深國會官員, 在我看來, are the FEW. 他們選擇我們的法官 (通過確認) 並幫助培養, 通過 他們的舉措, 一個行使憲法權利的文化反對民眾的不公正和無情的警察殺戮被許多美國人視為不愛國,,en,根據少年問題,,en,無論犯罪情況如何,都必須考慮青少年的緩解因素,,en,“憲法”禁止未成年人因犯同樣的罪行而被認為是成年人的罪魁禍首,,en,這意味著它適用於最終的案例,,en,許多被告審查了他們的案件,,en,最近,,en,基於這個問題,我知道一個人一直在努力爭取回到他的親人身邊,,en,與我聯繫以獲取更多信息,,en,囚犯在年齡之間犯下了他們的案件的罪行,,en.

青少年問題

我的很多好朋友都獲得了救濟或將在審查救濟, per the JUVENILE ISSUE. 少年是問題: No matter the crime committed a JUDGE MUST factor in the mitigating factors of a youth/adolescent (24 & 下) 之前,他們被判處. The Constitution proscribes that a juvenile cannot be held as culpable as an adult for committing the SAME crime, 除非法官首先評估青年的緩解因素.

因為這個問題是追溯, which means it applies to cases that are final (不再直接呼籲), many defendants have had their cases reviewed. Most recently, 第二巡迴授予第二次和連續上訪, based on this issue for a guy I know who has been fighting diligently to get back to his loved ones. 他一直在監獄裡 21+ 歲月.

如果你知道一個囚犯誰擁有的時候被一個少年的開始陰謀, contact me for more information. 如果你是一個特區. prisoner who committed the crimes of their case between the ages of 15-21, 聯絡我. 如果你認識自從他們是少年的人以來一直在監獄中,並且你想在這個問題上獲得更多的信息,,en,如果你知道某人在年齡介於他們之間時犯下謀殺罪,則必須提交強制生命刑,,en,甚至還寫過關於它的文章,,en,了解由於政策,大多數被關在聯邦和州監獄的被告都在那裡,,en,已經通過美國的舉措,,en,州立法機關通常會採取這些政策,讓他們通過其國家,以便它們可以幫助他們升入美國,,en,總統認為這些政策的大部分過於苛刻,並呼籲改變,,en,法律是法律,,en,他的選區中的社區不關心,,en, 請聯繫我. Lastly, if you know someone with a MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE for a murder committed while they were between the ages of 15-21, 請聯繫我.

約翰遜

這起案件已經不朽. 該 USA TODAY has even written articles on it. Understand that the majority of defendants locked up in Federal and State prisons are there due to POLICIES & INITIATIVES that have been passed by U.S. 國會官員. State law-makers usually take these policies and get them passed in their STATES so that it may help them to ascend to the U.S. 國會或獲得一些政治緩存. The President finds the majority of these policies too harsh and has called for CHANGE. 但是,如果你讀
眾議院的議長。 (古德拉特- ŗ) 採取它- 公平是公平的. The law is the law, 和總統應該尊重法律. The communities in his constituency do not care, 所以為什麼要他…右?

約翰遜案件採用了被告過去的犯罪行為加強了他們的判刑,從檢察官的做法中大刀闊斧地採取了一些措施,,en,並在大麻出售大麻,,en,然後我在其中收到另一個案件,,en,可以用它來給我一個,,en,我不會進入它,,en,但是當涉及到毒品犯罪時,處罰將呈指數級陡增,,en,如武裝職業犯罪法規,,en,法官在應用這個STIFF強制性處罰時沒有太多說法,,en,檢察官具有創造性,因此他們開始使用非暴力罪行的犯罪給予被告這些哈希強制性監禁條款,,en,法官呼籲改變,,en,不是由我們而是由憲法,,en,模糊性原則適用於美國嗎?,,en. 例如, 如果我搶了別人的 1993 and sold marijuana in 1999, then I catch another case in 2012, 那麼檢察官為基礎的對我過去的罪行- can use that to give me a 15 一年強制最低刑期. I won’t go into it, but the penalties are exponentially steeper when it comes to committing drug offenses in succession. 在有些情況下, such as The Armed Career Criminal Statute (ACCA), the judge has NO SAY in applying this STIFF mandatory penalty. 約翰遜有助於改變這種. Prosecutors are creative by nature so they began using crimes that were not crimes of violence to give defendants these hash mandatory terms of imprisonment. Judges have called for CHANGE, 但國會似乎無法扎堆做對, not by us but THE CONSTITUTION. 這並不是說在CNN和福克斯新聞故事.

中美. 最高人民法院關於審理比克爾斯

在U. Ş. 最高法院將審理的案件被稱為比克爾斯這個詞. 該比克爾斯情況下將回答一個問題ONLY: Does the Vagueness Doctrine apply to the U.S. 量刑指南? 傳統, 在中美. 法院沒有考慮判決指導原則,,en,這很奇怪,因為它們可以用來驅動一個,,en,判處一項事實上的強制性LIFE判決,,en,索托馬約爾大法官一直是CHAMPION,,en,以及臭名昭著的R.B.G,,en,該指南確實具有,,en,當涉及憲法問題時,,en,看看大多數人會如何制定持股會很有趣,,en,多數決定或複數意見是首選,但不是一個分裂的決定,,en,對於任何人在判決時沒有評估個人可及性的藥物案件,我請您與我聯繫,,en,如果你只賣了,,en,陰謀中的一小部分藥物被判刑,好像你賣掉了陰謀中的所有藥物一樣,,en,我的好例子是'The,,en “效應律” 作為刑事法規, which is odd since they can be used to drive a 12 year sentence to a de facto mandatory LIFE sentence. Justice Sotomayor who has been a CHAMPION, along with The Notorious R.B.G. (Ruth Bader Ginsburg), 曾在一個名為PEUGH情況進行了說明, that the Guidelines Do have the “力 & EFFECT” 法規的 , when it comes to CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES (像正當程序’ 事後條款). It will be interesting to see how the majority will frame the holding. 記得有八個法官. A majority decision or plural opinion is preferred but not a split decision of 4-4. 當心這知會備忘.

韋爾奇

For anyone who has a drug case whose INDIVIDUAL CULPABILITY was not assessed at sentencing I ask you to contact me. 例如: if you only sold (每成績單) a small portion of the drugs in a Conspiracy but got sentenced as if you sold all the drugs in the Conspiracy, 請聯繫我. My great example is ‘The 10 基洛可卡因陰謀’ 三個人是這個陰謀的一部分,一個人賣了一公斤,,en,這將共謀者放在不同的類別中,,en,BOOKER和ALLEYNE向法院提出有關單獨藥物重量的問題,,en,在我們開始提交這些動作之前,我們正在等待AFTER貝克斯決定,,en,但在BECKLES之前,我們正在就此問題與被告進行聯繫,,en,如果BECKLES規定了憲法學說,,en,會影響美國,,en,那麼其他憲法學說也應該這樣做,,en,它將允許最終的案件最終有一些合法的藉口,根據其個人有罪性來聽取他們的請求,,en,請記住,,en,辯稱與最高法院類似的事情,他們同意他的看法,,en,如果你有懇求,,en,那麼他現在正在檢查,看看是不是,,en, 其他賣出4公斤,其他銷售五公斤. This places the conspirators in different categories. 該 1 公斤的人應該在被判刑 21 南加州大學 841(b)(1)(Ç). 該 4 公斤的人應該在被判刑 21 南加州大學 841(b)(1)(乙). 該 5 公斤的人應該在被判刑 21 南加州大學 841(b)(1)(一).

我們誰曾主張一定APPRENDI的傢伙爭論, BOOKER and ALLEYNE issues to the court concerning there individual drug weight. We are waiting until AFTER Beckles is decided before we begin filing these motions, but we are contacting defendants about this issue prior to BECKLES. 總之, if BECKLES rules that a Constitutional Doctrine (模糊性學說) can affect the U.S. 量刑指南, then it would also follow that other Constitutional Doctrines should do the same. 什麼會做這? It will allow cases that are final to finally have some legal pretext to have their claims heard pursuant to their individual culpability. Please remember, 就在上學期, 韋爾奇, 誰是像你親當事人本身, argued something similar to the Supreme Court and they agreed with him. 所以不要放棄.

寬大

On August the 3, 2016, 奧巴馬總統改變他的策略上給予寬大處理. 他現在正在考慮 “削減TERM”. 意即, 例如, that if you had a plea 25 年,而不是去試了LIFE, then he is now checking to see if the “試用罰” ( 刑事被告在行使憲法權利時會得到審判,,en,造成了額外的時間,,en,他正在單獨評估你的罪行和懲罰,並給予一個終止在監獄外面而不是獄中內部的期限,,en,現在由於某些原因而被拒絕的申請人現在不會因為同樣的原因而被拒絕,,en,如果你有大量的屍體,我不知道重新歸檔還是歸檔是個好主意,,en,反對克萊門西,,en,如果你在監獄裡做了幾十年,或者知道一個在監獄裡的親人犯了不必要的時間犯罪,,en,通用法律規定我們為他人所需要的是我們將為自己獲得的,,en) caused the extra amount of time. HE is individually assessing your crime and punishment and granting a term that will end in release outside of prison instead of INSIDE of prison.

此外, 總統已經開闊了他的寬大倡議. Applicants who were previously denied for certain reasons would now not be denied for those same reasons.
我建議你仔細考慮你的情況. If you got a ton of bodies I do not know if it is a good idea to re-file or file. 但是,如果你以前拒絕,並沒有暴力,
我將重新文件立即如果我是你. 由於眾議院議長古德拉特如前所述 (ŗ) is opposed to Clemency.

這僅是與更新. 在我看來. If you are doing decades in prison or have or know a loved one in prison doing unnecessary amounts of time for their crime, 請聯繫我. UNIVERSAL LAW states what we want for others is what we will receive for ourselves.

Eric Van Buren
定罪後的戰略家
Author of The Art of Winning Litigation
聯合創始人的TAWL基金會

  

Leave a Reply

您的電子郵件地址不會被公開. 必填字段標 *


閱讀這本書!

選擇語言


編輯翻譯

快速射擊

Category