Menüü

Järgima @ Lockdownlive twitteris.

scdsc

detailid

  • Valitsus nimi: Eric Van Buren
  • Registreeri arv: 11044-068
  • Vanus:42
  • Aeg Serveeritakse:14 aastat
  • Kodulinnas:Washington D.C.
  • Lause:LIFE
  • Praegune Charge:Narkomaania Conspiracy
  • Teise nimega:Big Erk, Tilk Face, Beezer
  • Väljalaskekuupäev:armuandmise kandidaat
  • Vangla Liitumine:Another Chance 4 Legal (AC4L)
  • Ringi mõju:Marcus Martin, Another Chance 4 Legal
  • Institutsioon:USP Kaanan
  • There is no honor in coming to prison. It does NOT make you a man.

Criminal Justice Reform and the Obama Administration

This blog post is to give a heads up about what is good on the legal front. All prisoners who came to prison after 2008 should NOT listen to those who criticize the Obama Administration for doing NOTHING.

All the jail house lawyers will tell you the biggest difference in law now is that Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) claims filings do not take 12-36 months to be answered. Lisaks, the most sentencing reform in history has been effected during the tenure of the Obama Administration. Ma tean, Pered Against Kohustuslik miinimummääradeks (FAMM) võtab palju krediiti seda, kuid, olema teatud, it wasn’t until the Obama Administration was in office that the culture of the judicial and legislative branches began to change. Do not be fooled.

Ka mis tahes vanglas juristina ütlen teile, et enne 2008 there was not as many people leaving prison as there are today. This is statistically proven. Lastly, kui Obama ametisse astus FOIA-reform, sentencing reform and prison reform were posted on the White House’s official website as civil objectives on the administration’s to-do list.

Pärast 2008, oleme näinud palju häid seadusega – Peugh, Alleyne, Miller, Riley, Johnson, Descamps'i, Lafler, ja Frye – kõik Riigikohtu otsused . . . I could go on. Most recently I have written about Montgomery v. Louisiana, a great case that has the opportunity to change how lower courts deal with habeas claims. Lastly, mitu USA-d. District Courts have stood up against prosecutorial misconduct and even filed legal opinions on the epidemic of BRADY violations in today’s justice system.

We even had unprecedented comments from Eric Holder saying we are a society that “üle-incarcerates” ja mis jagab “karmid karistused”. The talk from the Attorney General during the Bush Administration was just the opposite. Tegelikult, even though the Supreme Court fell one step short of calling today’s drug laws unconstitutional, põhjustel rassilisest diagonaal, Bushi administratsioon väitsid ikka vastu mis tahes vähendamiste, whereas Eric Holder argued for reductions. Ja, Oh jah, kohtuekspertiisi tõendeid on muutunud. The degree of certainty previously assigned to forensic science has come under great scrutiny since 2008. FAMM ja teised näivad unustada neid fakte, Aga ma ei.

Tänase seisuga, President Obama on muutis 240+ sentences and looks to increase that number, enneolematu ja ajaloolise võrrelda. Ka, there is substantial movement with juvenile justice reform. teaduslikult, aastaselt 25 should be the threshold to distinguish juveniles and adults. There is so much talk that in Connecticut their legislature is investigating whether to raise the legal age for juveniles to 21. Ka, Alleyne tehtud McMillan mittekontrollivaid, effecting many sentences. per Montgomery, there is plenty to argue per the 5th Amendment for cases that are final or successive as well as the 6th Amendment for cases that are not final.

Ameerika Ühendriike. Senati ja USA-s. Esindajatekoda tundub tasakaalukas läbida arve osutas vanglast karistuse reform. Kuigi ma võib olla märgitud “see arve haiseb” see on ikka kõik hea neile see mõjutab. On ka armuandmise. There are also a lot of issues to argue per the HOBBS ACT (Nexus), RICO, VICAR Section 848, Karistuse valgekraede kuriteod, ja nimekiri läheb edasi. Before 2008, Ükski neist võimalustest olemas, ja USA-s. District Courts could have cared less about allowing relief in cases that were final. All this has changed.

Mäletama, kohta The Art of võita Kohtuvaidlus fondi uuring, 85% of prisoners have been convicted of greater offenses than the evidence in their case does supports or have sentences that are suurem kui vaja saavutada õigusemõistmise eesmärkidega. Ameerika Ühendriike. Ringkonnakohtud ei tunnista seda, aga täna nad paremini mõista, kuidas kasutada mehhanisme jao 2255(f) & (h).

Murrab selle üles, this past week during an oral argument in a case called Welch, justiits- Breyer väitis, et ei “raske uskuda” that once the Supreme Court determined that a statute was no longer Constitutional, Kõige süüdistatavad ebasoodsasse statuut, ikka jäi vanglasse. Sa mulle öelda, mis on hea. Kas on lahti vahel Scotus ja alama astme kohtud või keegi määratakse hoida inimesi vangi. Welch oli pro se avaldajale. He filed, Ta ei takistanud või saa takistada. He kept the torch lit and filed a pro se Certiorari to the U.S. ülemkohus, after the District Court and the Circuit Court told him he was WRONG! Ta otsustas vajutage küsimus! Advokaat General nõustub ta on õige.

Vabadus on võitlust väärt!

Eric Van Buren
Post-Veendumus strateeg / konsultant
Author of The Art of Winning Litigation

konsultant:
Another Chance 4 Legal
Bitt of Law
Äratab Meedia
The Feldman Group
Investa lk I. rühm

  

Leave a Reply

Sinu e-postiaadressi ei avaldata. Kohustuslikud väljad on märgitud *


Read this book!

Vali keel


Edit Tõlge

Quick Shots

Category